January 2008
News
Following the controversy
surrounding the Dutch and Belgian clinical trials of PGS in different patient
groups, which featured in the late breaking session at last years ESHRE Annual
Meeting in Lyon, incoming Chairman, Professor Joep Geraedts, has organised an
ESHRE PGS Task Force. The main aim of the Task Force, which meets for the first
time on January 26th, is to consider organising a multicentre
randomised clinical trial and to get a consensus on appropriate indications and
the protocols to be used, which has been widely criticised in previous trials.
As a long term advocate of PGS for women at high risk, I
am pleased to be part of the Task Force and look forward to working with our
Bridge Genoma partners to make the trial a success.
Professor Alan Handyside (Co-Director)
© 2008 Bridge Genoma (ISO registered)
|
|
 |
| Double Strand
Welcome to 'Double Strand'
our first Bridge Genoma newsletter. We aim to keep you informed about important
developments in reproductive and preimplantation genetics and update you on the
services and genetic tests we offer.
Since our launch in November
2006, we have successfully established a preimplantation genetic diagnosis
(PGD) service with our partners, Genoma Laboratories in Rome, enabling us to
offer test development for any couple with a known single gene disorder within
1-2 months. These bespoke tests are comparable to the most advanced available
anywhere and include mutation detection by mini-sequencing, combined with
linked markers wherever possible (so-called 'haplotyping'). Uniquely in the UK,
we can also include markers for chromosomes 21, 18 and 13 in cases of advanced
maternal age or where there may be a high risk of aneuploidy.
We are also committed to
providing comprehensive support to enable patients to be treated at the clinic
of their choice. These services include HFEA license preparation, professional
genetic counselling and, if needed, locum biopsy practitioners to work with or
support the clinic's own embryology team.
Chromosomal aneuploidy is a
leading cause of embryo morbidity and pregnancy loss. Our Camden laboratory has
a dedicated team for molecular cytogenetics including a state registered
clinical cytogeneticist. For women of advanced maternal age, we currently offer
preimplantation genetic screening for 8 chromosomes (now including chromosome
15) designed to significantly reduce the risk of transferring embryos with
potentially viable but abnormal aneuploidies and other abnormalities frequently
associated with miscarriage.
Other tests include PGD for
chromosomal translocations, aneuploidy screening of sperm and pharmacogenetic
testing of FSH receptor polymorphisms to optimise ovarian response.
Our laboratory was ISO 9001; 2000
registered in November, 2007 and we are proud to be working with several of the
UK's most prominent IVF centres.
Alan Thornhill PhD,
Director
* Research highlights *
Trend towards improved clinical outcomes in infertile
patients following PGS
Most clinics offering
preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in the UK only recommend screening in
poor prognosis patients or for women in their late 30s and 40s in which there
is good evidence of a high incidence of aneuploidy and an increased rate of
preclinical and clinical pregnancy loss.
Recently, a large scale
multicentre randomised controlled trial of clinical outcome following PGS in
all women over the age of 35 demonstrated a significant decrease in live birth
rate with screening[1]. Although
the methodology of this trial has been criticised[2],
one explanation is that embryo biopsy and screening may be detrimental in
patients at relatively low risk of aneuploidy i.e. patients at the lower end of
this age range.
Mersereau et al[3]
now report on the interim analysis of a prospective randomised controlled trial
designed to evaluate the effect of PGS for chromosomes X, Y, 22, 21, 18, 16 and
13 on clinical outcome in infertile patients generally, without restricting
screening to poor prognosis patients. Although there was no statistically
significant improvement in live birth rates or implantation rates in this pilot
study (see Table below), in contrast to the larger trial, there was a trend
towards improved clinical outcomes. The authors therefore conclude that further
multicentre randomised trials will be needed to resolve these conflicting
results.
| Control (n=25) | PGS (n=28) | P | | Maternal age | 33.5±3.8 | 35.2± | .166 | | No of oocytes | 14.4±6.5 | 14.9±7.0 | .762 | | No of 2PN | 11.6±6.0 | 10.7±3.7 | .519 | | No transferred | 2.1±0.3 | 2.1±0.3 | .886 | | Positive hCG | 32.0 | 50.0 | .184 | | Implantation rate (%) | 20.0 | 25.4 | .524 | | Live birth rate (%) | 29.2 | 39.3 | .444 |
[1] Mastenbroek,
S et al (2007) In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic screening.
New Engl J Med. 357(1):9-17
[2] Handyside,
AH , Thornhill, AR (2007) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic
screening. N Engl J Med. 357(17):1770
[3] Mersereau,
JE, Pergament, E, Xhang, X, Milad, MP (2007) Preimplantation genetic screening
to improve in vitro fertilisation pregnancy rates: a prospective randomised
trial. Fertility and Sterility [Epub ahead of print]
In future issues:
Microarrays in PGD, Pharmacogenetics and response to ovarian stimulation, and
advanced Y chromosome microdeletion testing.
For more information, please
visit our website or contact us at:
Bridge Genoma
London Bioscience Innovation
Centre
2 Royal College
Street, London, NW1 0NH
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7089
1443, Fax: +44 (0) 20 7691 2027
Email: enquiries@bridgegenoma.com
Website: www.bridgegenoma.com
|